“Made With Whole Grain”

“Made With Whole Grain”

The topic of this post is misleading ingredient claims. Most of us want to see more whole grains and more fruits and vegetables in what we eat. Food companies know this and they fill the grocery store with packages that claim “made with” whole grains, fruits or vegetables. The FDA does not have any guidelines for the use of these ingredient claims. The FDA also does not require the food companies to include how much of the claimed ingredient is actually in the food. The ingredient list can give the consumer some sort of idea because ingredients are listed in order of quantity. The first ingredient in the ingredient list is the largest ingredient in the product and quantity goes down as the list goes on. But there is no way to tell what the actual amount of the ingredient is from the ingredient list position.

This means food companies can easily trick consumers into thinking their product has a lot of whole grains or fruit when it in fact contains miniscule amounts. When buying products that claim “made with whole grains” on the package, you should flip the package over and take a look at the ingredient list. Most of the time, the first ingredient will be “unbleached enriched wheat flour” which is not a whole grain. “Whole wheat flour” is a whole grain, and often times this will be in the ingredient list further down… meaning the product contains relatively little actual whole grains. If you want to increase your whole grain intake, make sure whole wheat flour is the first ingredient in the list.

“Made with” certain fruits and vegetables works the same way. Examples! Strawberry Splash Fruit Gushers say that they are “made with real fruit” if you look at the label more carefully you will find that they products doesn’t contain any strawberries! The “real fruit” is actually pears from concentrate and the strawberry color comes from Red No. 40 dye… the product is also almost half sugar which is not healthy at all. Knorr Chicken Broccoli fettuccini also uses this trick. By using the word “broccoli” in the name of the product it makes you believe there is a substantial amount of broccoli present. If you look at the ingredient list however, you will find that it actually contains more salt than broccoli.

Stay tuned for the next post on “all natural” foods!

8 Tips to Look Great in 8 Days and Smoothie Basics and an Allergen Free Menu Plan!

8 Tips to Look Great in 8 Days and Smoothie Basics and an Allergen Free Menu Plan!

8 Tips to Look GREAT in 8
We all want to look great and we all want it right now! These are some healthy tips to make you look as great as you can in 8 days.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MFSgmygkm4]

Smoothie Basics

Use a rice, hemp or pea protein as a base aim for 15 – 20 grams of protein. Use ½ cup of a ‘milk’ try unsweetened almond milk, rice

milk or coconut milk. Add 1 cup of organic berries. Don’t forget the fat (yes, fat. You NEED fat) ½ tablespoon of coconut oil, flax seed oil or 1 tablespoon of flax seed meal. Mix, blend and add water or ice to get it to the thickness that you desire. Add variety as much as you can in the 5 days that you are doing the jump start program.

(more…)

“Made With Whole Grain”

“0 Trans Fat” Is Not Necessarily Healthy

In continuing our discussion of “health halos,” we’re going to talk about trans fats. Trans fat has been very big in the news in the past few years because it was found that it is has very negative effects on cholesterol levels. The FDA concluded that trans fats are at least as harmful if not more harmful than saturated fats and play a large role in increasing your risk of heart disease. As a result of these findings, the FDA requires that trans fat content be shared on the food package label. Because there was so much negative press about trans fats, many food companies ended up changing the make-up of their products so that they wouldn’t include any trans fats at all. This sounds like a really great thing for us as consumers of these products. In reality though, many of these companies did not end up making their products healthier by taking out the trans fats. The simply replaced the trans fats with saturated fats. Which, as denoted earlier, are just as bad as the trans fats they are replacing.

So, when a package reads “0 trans fat” on the label, it does not mean it is healthy, it can still have large amounts of saturated fat. For example! Edy’s Dibs ice cream treats say “0 trans fat” on the front but when you read the nutrition facts panel on the back, they contain a whopping 16 grams of saturated fat per serving! To put this in perspective, the FDA considers 4 grams per serving to be high and does not allow products with saturated fat levels above 4 grams to make health claims on their packages. “0 trans fat” is not considered a health claim, so the package is tricking the customer into believing the product is healthy!

I really hope this series on healthy marketing is helping you to see past the packaging and make more informed decisions about what you are putting into your bodies. We have two posts left; the next on misleading ingredient claims for whole grains and fruit and vegetable content and the last on misleading “natural” claims. Check back soon for those!

“Made With Whole Grain”

“Qualified Health Claims” Are Anything But Qualified

In our last post about health halos surrounding food marketing, we discussed structure/function claims. This post, we’re going to talk about “qualified health claims.” The word qualified makes the phrase sound good, but what it actually means is that the claims are qualified by a statement following the claim that says the basis for the health claim is uncertain. There is specific wording that the FDA allows for these qualified health claims (QHC). And example from the CSPI “Food Labeling Chaos” report follows:

“Very limited and preliminary scientific research suggests that eating one-half cup of tomatoes and/or tomato sauce a week may reduce the risk of prostate cancer. FDA concludes that there is little scientific evidence supporting this claim.”

Obviously this doesn’t seem like something that would be very persuading on a package, so food companies often only use the positive part of the approved wording. “May reduce the risk of prostate cancer” sounds pretty good. Some companies choose to print the entire claim in small print somewhere and then use the positive wording to catch attention in other areas. Some companies change the QHC’s completely. And some just use the name of a nutrient on the packaging which no claim at all.

For example!

You have probably tried or heard of Kashi brand foods. They have a line of instant oatmeal called Heart to Heart. On the package, they indicate the presence of green tea in the oatmeal and go on to say that it supports healthy arteries. There is an approved qualified health claim for green tea, but it is for cancer, not heart disease. Many people have heard in the news or other media that green tea is good for you for various reasons, so the food company catches your attention by telling you that green tea is included in their product and then they change the QHC completely, from cancer to heart disease!

As with the structure/function claims, there are also no nutritional standards for these claims. The QHC’s can be used and the product may be full of fat and sugar and only contain trace quantities of the supposed beneficial nutrient.

How do companies get away with twisting QHC wording like this? The FDA states that it will not take enforcement action against health claims that fail to meet “significant scientific agreement”. And the Federal Trade Commission does not have a procedure for reviewing advertising claims before they are made. Therefore, they can only be stopped after the claims have been made and “significant scientific agreement” has been found.

The use of qualified health claims in marketing make it very hard for you and I to determine what is true and what isn’t. Be critical while doing your grocery shopping and read labels carefully. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. As you look through your fridge and pantry, do you spot any products with qualified health claims or structure/function claims?

For the full CSPI report: http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/food_labeling_chaos_report.pdf